Re: [PATCH 3/3] lutimesat: actual syscall and wire-up on i386

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Mon Jan 29 2007 - 10:07:37 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: VM: Fix nasty and subtle race in shared mmap'ed page writeback"
Previous message: Jose Goncalves: "Re: Oops on serial access on kernel 2.6.16.38"
In reply to: Alexey Dobriyan: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] lutimesat: actual syscall and wire-up on i386"
Next in thread: Alexey Dobriyan: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] lutimesat: actual syscall and wire-up on i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> What do you mean by "filesystems cannot support lutimes"? Filesystems
> that don't have on-disk timestamps for symlinks?

Yes.

--
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: VM: Fix nasty and subtle race in shared mmap'ed page writeback"
Previous message: Jose Goncalves: "Re: Oops on serial access on kernel 2.6.16.38"
In reply to: Alexey Dobriyan: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] lutimesat: actual syscall and wire-up on i386"
Next in thread: Alexey Dobriyan: "Re: [PATCH 3/3] lutimesat: actual syscall and wire-up on i386"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]