Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit

[Dave Jones]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:30:56PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
 > 
 > Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:06:17AM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
 > >  > Then there is the issue of architectures, at least in my book KS should
 > >  > focus on the ones that are really live and not in maintenance mode.
 > >  > x86_64, x86_32, PPC, ia64, ARM seems to be the driving ones these days,
 > >  > m68k, Sparc32, and others, somewhat less so .....
 > > 
 > > Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or
 > > sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented.
 > 
 > Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k
 > for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much
 > contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion.

Right, other than during the CPU architects panel, I don't remember
any non x86/ia64/ppc stuff being brought up at all.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/