Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions

[Jeff Garzik]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:49:16 +0100
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc7 compared to 2.6.19
> > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
>
> There are still a few things hanging around.
>
> I have these queued:
>
> aio-fix-buggy-put_ioctx-call-in-aio_complete-v2.patch
> kexec-avoid-migration-of-already-disabled-irqs-ia64.patch
> net-smc911x-match-up-spin-lock-unlock.patch
> rtc-pcf8563-detect-polarity-of-century-bit-automatically.patch
> alpha-fix-epoll-syscall-enumerations.patch
> revert-blockdev-direct-io-back-to-2619-version.patch
> scsi-sd-udev-accessing-an-uninitialized-scsi_disk-results-in-a-crash.patch
> altix-more-acpi-prt-support.patch

Would you forward the x86-64 dma_noncoherent API build fix I posted? 
Anything that uses that API won't build on x86-64 without my [simple and 
obvious] patch.


> - I have r8169-fix-a-race-between-pci-probe-and-dev_open.patch floating
>   about, but I forget its status.  

I posted a preferred patch (which someone then noted need to use 
setup_timer), and am waiting for an "it works" response of some sort

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/