Re: sed _s_gnu_alternatives_ (Re: [rft] (g)awk substitution)

[David Weinehall]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:14:07PM +0000, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:03:32PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 January 2007 4:40 am, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > > > Your objection is a bit like saying "and don't use cat".  I'm saying don't 
> > > > call cat "gcat" when you just mean plain old cat.
> > > 
> > > No it's not, really. I don't want to see pipes, fork()s, disk seek,
> > > when task can be done without it. I know, what awk is, and i hope it
> > > will have its better time.
> > 
> > *shrug*  Making the need for "gawk" go away was my goal, and gawk->awk was the 
> > minimal change.  If you want more than that, I'm not objecting, just not 
> > personally interested.
> 
> Yes making uclibc as a bit more work, than rename things ;D. And my
> change is mainly from optimization point of view (say modern embedded ;)
> 
> > I believe "shift 5" is also SUSv3. :)
> 
> If you have tested, please send ack or nack to us.

Yes, shift [n] is available in SuSv3:

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/shift.html


Regards: David
-- 
 /) David Weinehall <tao@xxxxxxxxxx> /) Northern lights wander      (\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    (/   Full colour fire           (/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/