Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/gigaset: new M101 driver

From: Tilman Schmidt
Date: Mon Feb 05 2007 - 07:30:19 EST


Andrew Morton schrieb:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:42:09 +0100 Tilman Schmidt <tilman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> It's a pointer. Are reads and writes of pointer sized objects
>> guaranteed to be atomic on every platform?
>
> Yup - we make the same assumption about longs in various places.
>
> It's a bit strange to read a pointer which can be changing at the
> same time. Because the local copy will no longer represent the
> thing which it was just copied from.

It's not that bad. The only possible concurrent change is from NULL
to non-NULL. Fearing an inconsistent read in that event was too
paranoid apparently.

Thanks for all your suggestions. I'll prepare a new patch based on
them.

--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@xxxxxxx
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature