RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86_64 irq: Handle irqs pending in IRR duringirq migration.

[Lu, Yinghai]

From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>> How about let apic_hangle_pending_vector take the irq too?

>We can't compute the vector by reading the hardware registers after
>we have acknowledged the irq.

>I hope that was the answer you were looking for I'm not quite certain
>what you mean by take.

I mean 


+static void apic_handle_pending_vector(unsigned vector)
+{
+	unsigned irr;
+	int irq;
+
+	irq = __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector];
+	if (irq >= 0)
+		return;
+
+	/* If the irq we are servicing has moved and is not pending
+	 * free it's vector.
+	 */

==>

+static void apic_handle_pending_vector(unsigned vector, unsigned irqx)
+{
+	unsigned irr;
+	int irq;
+
+	irq = __get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[vector];
+	if ( (-irq) != irqx)
+		return;
+ 
+
+	/* If the irq we are servicing has moved and is not pending
+	 * free it's vector.
+	 */



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/