Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, David Miller wrote:
> 
> So the idea is to just run it to completion if it won't block and use
> a fibril if it would?

That's not how the patches work right now, but yes, I at least personally 
think that it's something we should aim for (ie the interface shouldn't 
_require_ us to always wait for things even if perhaps an early 
implementation might make everything be delayed at first)

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/