[PATCH 1/3] [RESEND] X.25: Add call forwarding

From: ahendry
Date: Wed Feb 07 2007 - 18:15:18 EST


Adds call forwarding to X.25, allowing it to operate like an X.25 router.
Useful if one needs to manipulate X.25 traffic with tools like tc.
This is an update/cleanup based off a patch submitted by Daniel Ferenci a few years ago.

Thanks Alan for the feedback.
Added the null check to the clones.
Moved the skb_clone's into the forwarding functions.

Worked ok with Cisco XoT, linux X.25 back to back, and some old NTUs/PADs.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@xxxxxxxxx>


diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/include/net/x25.h linux-2.6.20/include/net/x25.h
--- linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/include/net/x25.h 2007-02-05 05:44:54.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6.20/include/net/x25.h 2007-02-08 10:00:06.000000000 +1100
@@ -161,6 +161,14 @@ struct x25_sock {
unsigned long vc_facil_mask; /* inc_call facilities mask */
};

+struct x25_forward {
+ struct list_head node;
+ unsigned int lci;
+ struct net_device *dev1;
+ struct net_device *dev2;
+ atomic_t refcnt;
+};
+
static inline struct x25_sock *x25_sk(const struct sock *sk)
{
return (struct x25_sock *)sk;
@@ -198,6 +206,13 @@ extern int x25_negotiate_facilities(stru
struct x25_dte_facilities *);
extern void x25_limit_facilities(struct x25_facilities *, struct x25_neigh *);

+/* x25_forward.c */
+extern void x25_clear_forward_by_lci(unsigned int lci);
+extern void x25_clear_forward_by_dev(struct net_device *);
+extern int x25_forward_data(int, struct x25_neigh *, struct sk_buff *);
+extern int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *, struct x25_neigh *,
+ struct sk_buff *, int);
+
/* x25_in.c */
extern int x25_process_rx_frame(struct sock *, struct sk_buff *);
extern int x25_backlog_rcv(struct sock *, struct sk_buff *);
@@ -282,6 +297,8 @@ extern struct hlist_head x25_list;
extern rwlock_t x25_list_lock;
extern struct list_head x25_route_list;
extern rwlock_t x25_route_list_lock;
+extern struct list_head x25_forward_list;
+extern rwlock_t x25_forward_list_lock;

extern int x25_proc_init(void);
extern void x25_proc_exit(void);
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/af_x25.c linux-2.6.20/net/x25/af_x25.c
--- linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/af_x25.c 2007-02-05 05:44:54.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6.20/net/x25/af_x25.c 2007-02-08 10:00:06.000000000 +1100
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ int x25_rx_call_request(struct sk_buff *
struct x25_address source_addr, dest_addr;
struct x25_facilities facilities;
struct x25_dte_facilities dte_facilities;
- int len, rc;
+ int len, addr_len, rc;

/*
* Remove the LCI and frame type.
@@ -857,7 +857,8 @@ int x25_rx_call_request(struct sk_buff *
* Extract the X.25 addresses and convert them to ASCII strings,
* and remove them.
*/
- skb_pull(skb, x25_addr_ntoa(skb->data, &source_addr, &dest_addr));
+ addr_len = x25_addr_ntoa(skb->data, &source_addr, &dest_addr);
+ skb_pull(skb, addr_len);

/*
* Get the length of the facilities, skip past them for the moment
@@ -873,11 +874,27 @@ int x25_rx_call_request(struct sk_buff *
sk = x25_find_listener(&source_addr,skb);
skb_push(skb,len);

+ if (sk != NULL && sk_acceptq_is_full(sk)) {
+ goto out_sock_put;
+ }
+
/*
- * We can't accept the Call Request.
+ * We dont have any listeners for this incoming call.
+ * Try forwarding it.
*/
- if (sk == NULL || sk_acceptq_is_full(sk))
- goto out_clear_request;
+ if (sk == NULL) {
+ skb_push(skb, addr_len + X25_STD_MIN_LEN);
+ if (x25_forward_call(&dest_addr, nb, skb, lci) > 0)
+ {
+ /* Call was forwarded, dont process it any more */
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ rc = 1;
+ goto out;
+ } else {
+ /* No listeners, can't forward, clear the call */
+ goto out_clear_request;
+ }
+ }

/*
* Try to reach a compromise on the requested facilities.
@@ -1598,6 +1615,9 @@ void x25_kill_by_neigh(struct x25_neigh
x25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH, 0, 0);

write_unlock_bh(&x25_list_lock);
+
+ /* Remove any related forwards */
+ x25_clear_forward_by_dev(nb->dev);
}

static int __init x25_init(void)
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/Makefile linux-2.6.20/net/x25/Makefile
--- linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/Makefile 2007-02-05 05:44:54.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6.20/net/x25/Makefile 2007-02-08 10:00:06.000000000 +1100
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_X25) += x25.o

x25-y := af_x25.o x25_dev.o x25_facilities.o x25_in.o \
x25_link.o x25_out.o x25_route.o x25_subr.o \
- x25_timer.o x25_proc.o
+ x25_timer.o x25_proc.o x25_forward.o
x25-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += sysctl_net_x25.o
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/x25_dev.c linux-2.6.20/net/x25/x25_dev.c
--- linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/x25_dev.c 2007-02-05 05:44:54.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6.20/net/x25/x25_dev.c 2007-02-08 10:00:06.000000000 +1100
@@ -67,9 +67,18 @@ static int x25_receive_data(struct sk_bu
return x25_rx_call_request(skb, nb, lci);

/*
- * Its not a Call Request, nor is it a control frame.
- * Let caller throw it away.
+ * Its not a Call Request, nor is it a control frame.
+ * Can we forward it?
*/
+
+ if (x25_forward_data(lci, nb, skb)) {
+ if (frametype == X25_CLEAR_CONFIRMATION) {
+ x25_clear_forward_by_lci(lci);
+ }
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
/*
x25_transmit_clear_request(nb, lci, 0x0D);
*/
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/x25_forward.c linux-2.6.20/net/x25/x25_forward.c
--- linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/x25_forward.c 1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6.20/net/x25/x25_forward.c 2007-02-08 10:00:48.000000000 +1100
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/*
+ * This module:
+ * This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * History
+ * 03-01-2007 Added forwarding for x.25 Andrew Hendry
+ */
+#include <linux/if_arp.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <net/x25.h>
+
+struct list_head x25_forward_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(x25_forward_list);
+DEFINE_RWLOCK(x25_forward_list_lock);
+
+int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, int lci)
+{
+ struct x25_route *rt;
+ struct x25_neigh *neigh_new = NULL;
+ struct list_head *entry;
+ struct x25_forward *x25_frwd, *new_frwd;
+ struct sk_buff *skbn;
+ short same_lci = 0;
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ if ((rt = x25_get_route(dest_addr)) != NULL) {
+
+ if ((neigh_new = x25_get_neigh(rt->dev)) == NULL) {
+ /* This shouldnt happen, if it occurs somehow
+ * do something sensible
+ */
+ goto out_put_route;
+ }
+
+ /* Avoid a loop. This is the normal exit path for a
+ * system with only one x.25 iface and default route
+ */
+ if (rt->dev == from->dev) {
+ goto out_put_nb;
+ }
+
+ /* Remote end sending a call request on an already
+ * established LCI? It shouldnt happen, just in case..
+ */
+ read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+ list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) {
+ x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
+ if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "X.25: call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n");
+ same_lci = 1;
+ }
+ }
+ read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+
+ /* Save the forwarding details for future traffic */
+ if (!same_lci){
+ if ((new_frwd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct x25_forward),
+ GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_put_nb;
+ }
+ new_frwd->lci = lci;
+ new_frwd->dev1 = rt->dev;
+ new_frwd->dev2 = from->dev;
+ write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+ list_add(&new_frwd->node, &x25_forward_list);
+ write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+ }
+
+ /* Forward the call request */
+ if ( (skbn = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
+ goto out_put_nb;
+ }
+ x25_transmit_link(skbn, neigh_new);
+ rc = 1;
+ }
+
+
+out_put_nb:
+ x25_neigh_put(neigh_new);
+
+out_put_route:
+ x25_route_put(rt);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+
+int x25_forward_data(int lci, struct x25_neigh *from, struct sk_buff *skb) {
+
+ struct x25_forward *frwd;
+ struct list_head *entry;
+ struct net_device *peer = NULL;
+ struct x25_neigh *nb;
+ struct sk_buff *skbn;
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+ list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) {
+ frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
+ if (frwd->lci == lci) {
+ /* The call is established, either side can send */
+ if (from->dev == frwd->dev1) {
+ peer = frwd->dev2;
+ } else {
+ peer = frwd->dev1;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+
+ if ( (nb = x25_get_neigh(peer)) == NULL)
+ goto out;
+
+ if ( (skbn = pskb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
+ goto out;
+
+ }
+ x25_transmit_link(skbn, nb);
+
+ x25_neigh_put(nb);
+ rc = 1;
+out:
+ return rc;
+}
+
+void x25_clear_forward_by_lci(unsigned int lci)
+{
+ struct x25_forward *fwd;
+ struct list_head *entry, *tmp;
+
+ write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, &x25_forward_list) {
+ fwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
+ if (fwd->lci == lci) {
+ list_del(&fwd->node);
+ kfree(fwd);
+ }
+ }
+ write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+}
+
+
+void x25_clear_forward_by_dev(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct x25_forward *fwd;
+ struct list_head *entry, *tmp;
+
+ write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, &x25_forward_list) {
+ fwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
+ if ((fwd->dev1 == dev) || (fwd->dev2 == dev)){
+ list_del(&fwd->node);
+ kfree(fwd);
+ }
+ }
+ write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+}
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.20/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/x25_route.c linux-2.6.20/net/x25/x25_route.c
--- linux-2.6.20-vanilla.clean/net/x25/x25_route.c 2007-02-05 05:44:54.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6.20/net/x25/x25_route.c 2007-02-08 10:00:06.000000000 +1100
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ void x25_route_device_down(struct net_de
__x25_remove_route(rt);
}
write_unlock_bh(&x25_route_list_lock);
+
+ /* Remove any related forwarding */
+ x25_clear_forward_by_dev(dev);
}

/*

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/