Re: [PATCH] remove sb->s_files and file_list_lock usage in dquot.c

From: hui
Date: Fri Feb 09 2007 - 02:23:39 EST


On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:14:04PM -0800, Bill Huey wrote:
> I have an adaptive lock implementation in my tree that eliminates
> the contention between what looks like the IDE layer, work queues and
> the anticipatory scheduler, but that's not a real problem unlike what
> I've mentioned above. I can get you and others more specifics on the
> problem if folks working on the lower layers want it.

Correction, it eliminates all of the "live" contentions where the
mutex owner isn't asleep already.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/