Re: Coding style RFC: convert "for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(array);i++)"to "array_for_each(index, array)"

[Randy Dunlap]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:37:38 +0200 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:47:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> > Now that most of the sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]) conversions have
> > been done (there are about 800 done and about another 130 left),
> > perhaps it could be useful to change the code to use a define
> > similar to the list_for_each
> > 
> > #define list_for_each(pos, head) \
> > 	for (pos = (head)->next; prefetch(pos->next), pos != (head); \
> >         	pos = pos->next)
> > 
> > perhaps
> > 
> > #define array_for_each(index, array) \
> > 	for ((index) = 0; (index) < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); (index)++)
> 
> Could we please stop "improving" the C language? it has served us fine
> so far.

I'm with Muli.  The open-coded for loop is fine (using ARRAY_SIZE).

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/