Re: [patch 00/11] ANNOUNCE: "Syslets", generic asynchronous systemcall support

[Davide Libenzi]

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > If this is going to be a generic AIO subsystem:
> > > 
> > > - Cancellation of peding request
> > 
> > What about the busy_async_threads list becoming a hash/rb_tree indexed 
> > by syslet_atom ptr. A cancel would lookup the thread and send a signal 
> > (of course, signal handling of the async threads should be set 
> > properly)?
> 
> well, each async syslet has a separate TID at the moment, so if we want 
> a submitted syslet to be cancellable then we could return the TID of the 
> syslet handler (instead of the NULL) in sys_async_exec(). Then 
> user-space could send a signal the old-fashioned way, via sys_tkill(), 
> if it so wishes.

That works too. I was thinking about identifying syslets with the 
userspace ptr, but the TID is fine too.



> the TID could also be used in a sys_async_wait_on() API. I.e. it would 
> be a natural, readily accessible 'cookie' for the pending work. TIDs can 
> be looked up lockless via RCU, so it's reasonably fast as well.
> 
> ( Note that there's already a way to 'signal' pending syslets: do_exit() 
>   in the user context will signal all async contexts (which results in 
>   -EINTR of currently executing syscalls, wherever possible) and will 
>   tear them down. But that's too crude for aio_cancel() i guess. )

Yup.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/