Re: [PATCH 0/6] MODSIGN: Kernel module signing

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:09:38 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> These patches provide a GPG-based kernel module signing facility.  Their use is
> not fully automated within the confines of the kernel build process because it
> needs provision of keys from outside of the kernel before the kernel can be
> compiled.
> 
> The patches are:
> 
>  (1) A cut-down MPI library derived from GPG with error handling added.
> 
>  (2) Permit hash algorithms to hash kernel data defined by a virtual address
>      and a length rather than trying to use scattergather lists (which require
>      struct page pointers to be determined).
> 
>  (3) Add extra information to the per-arch ELF headers to more fully describe
>      the format of the ELF metadata.
> 
>  (4) Add module verification capabilities, including ELF metadata verification.
> 
>  (5) Add a generic DSA signature checker.  Given a SHA1 hash of the data to be
>      verified and a binary blob holding a GPG signature stream, this verifies
>      the signature using a built-in ring of public keys.
> 
>  (6) Add a module signature checker that applies signature checking to modules
>      on module load, checking the signature against the ring of public keys
>      compiled into the kernel.

Grand total:

 77 files changed, 9681 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

just to be able to sign modules.

Normally I'd collapse writhing in laughter, but..

> These patches have been in use by RHEL and Fedora kernels for years, and so
> have been thoroughly tested.

so I guess there's an argument for merging them so we can send them back to
you guys.  But there's also an argument to declare all this gunk a
vendor-only thing.  How much pain would that cause?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/