Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks

[Chris Wright]

* Casey Schaufler (casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> --- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  
> > It's unfortunate, agreed, but
> > 
> > use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a
> > no-go.
> 
> You're going to have to justify this assertion.
> I know of at least one work-in-progress for which
> LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity
> claims of SELinux.

Serge is referring to the objections to EVM/IMA
as LSM because it was not doing access control,
rather integrity measurements.  It's all in
somewhere the archives.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/