Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* William Lee Irwin III (wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800, William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance,
> >> something like:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:29:44AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some
> > consensus here :)
> 
> It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather
> leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it.
> I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda
> when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU)
> etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to
> consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)
> 
> 
> -- wli

Hello,

William's implementation is indeed neater than mine. So the consensus
goes to his patch as far as I'm concerned.

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/