Re: [PATCH] tcp_cubic: use 32 bit math

From: Stephen Hemminger
Date: Mon Mar 12 2007 - 17:14:09 EST


On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:48:26 +0100
Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:51:35PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:10:47 -0800
> >
> > > David Miller wrote:
> > > > What about Willy Tarreau's supposedly even faster variant?
> > > > Or does this incorporate that set of improvements?
> > > >
> > > That's what this is:
> > > x = (2 * x + (uint32_t)div64_64(a, (uint64_t)x*(uint64_t)x)) / 3;
> >
> > Great, thanks for the clarification.
>
> Oh BTW, I have a newer version with a first approximation of the
> cbrt() before the div64_64, which allows us to reduce from 3 div64
> to only 2 div64. This results in a version which is twice as fast
> as the initial one (ncubic), but with slightly less accuracy (0.286%
> compared to 0.247). But I see that other functions such as hcbrt()
> had a 1.5% avg error, so I think this is not dramatic.

Ignore my hcbrt() it was a less accurate version of andi's stuff.

> Also, I managed to remove all other divides, to be kind with CPUs
> having a slow divide instruction or no divide at all. Since we compute
> on limited range (22 bits), we can multiply then shift right. It shows
> me even slightly better time on pentium-m and athlon, with a slightly
> higher avg error (0.297% compared to 0.286%), and slightly smaller
> code.

What does the code look like?


> I just have to clean experiments from my code to provide a patch.
> David, Stephen, are you interested ?
>
> $ ./bictcp
> fls(0)=0, fls(1)=1, fls(256)=9
> Calibrating
> Function clocks mean(us) max(us) std(us) Avg error
> bictcp 936 0.61 24.28 1.99 0.172%
> ocubic 886 0.57 23.51 3.18 0.274%
> ncubic 644 0.42 16.59 2.18 0.247%
> ncubic32 444 0.29 11.47 1.50 0.247%
> ncubic32_1 444 0.29 11.56 1.88 0.238%
> ncubic32b3 337 0.22 8.67 0.88 0.286%
> ncubic_ndiv3 329 0.21 8.46 0.69 0.297%
> acbrt 707 0.46 18.05 0.80 0.275%
> hcbrt 644 0.42 16.44 0.51 1.580%
>
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>


--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/