Re: [PATCH 1/1] LinuxPPS: Pulse per Second support for Linux

[Lennart Sorensen]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:27:12PM +0100, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> Ok! Thanks.
> 
> Yes, this could be a good solution while waiting for a new setserial.

Now you said to check the return value of time_pps_readlink.  Well it
returns void so that isn't much good, and the stuff the wiki says to do,
appears to be done internally by the function.  So I guess that means I
should undo that change so that I can actually get ntpd to compile
again.

If the call was to readlink directly it needs to be done, while your
time_pps_readlink is just a handy wrapper that does all that for you,
right?

--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/