Re: [PATCH 2/5] revoke: core code

From: Pekka J Enberg
Date: Fri Mar 16 2007 - 10:46:10 EST


On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> What you're trying to do here is very similar to truncate(), and truncate()
> has had a lot of work put into it, and it does work.

Indeed. revoke() is the same as truncate() without, well, the truncation
part.

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> However, modifying i_size like this might be a problem - the inode could be
> dirty and it'll get written to disk! Perhaps we could change i_size_read()
> to cheat and to return zero if there's a revoke in progress.

Hmph, it's probably going to get too painful so I'll look at adding some
hooks to do_generic_mapping_read()...

Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/