Re: [patch 00/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation forparavirt_ops interface

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>>  * virtual block device (blockfront)
>>  * virtual network device (netfront)
>>     
>
> note, these drivers should be submitted through the proper block drivers 
> and network drivers review process - not via the x86_64 tree.
>   

Yes; who should look at them?  I posted netfront to net-dev, and Stephen
Hemminger commented on it on the last repost, but I'd love them to get
more scrutiny.

Obviously they're not actually useful without Xen (and vice-versa), so
there's not much point in committing them separately.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/