Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31

From: Kasper Sandberg
Date: Wed Mar 21 2007 - 04:58:43 EST


On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 16:47 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:38 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:22 +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd recon KDE regresses because of kioslaves waiting on a pipe
> >>> (communication with the app they're doing IO for) and then expiring.
> >>> That's why splitting IO from an app isn't exactly smart. It should at
> >>> least be ran in an another thread.
> >> Hm. Sounds rather a lot like the...
> >> X sucks, fix X and RSDL will rock your world. RSDL is perfect.
> >> ...that I've been getting.
> >>
> > not really, only X sucks. KDE works atleast as good with rsdl as
> > vanilla. i dont know how originally said kde works worse, wasnt it just
> > someone that thought?
> >
> It was probably me, and I had the opinion that KDE is not as smooth as
> GNOME with RSDL. I haven't had time to measure, but using for daily
> stuff for about an hour each way hasn't changed my opinion. Every once
> in a while KDE will KLUNK to a halt for 200-300ms doing mundane stuff
> like redrawing a page, scrolling, etc. I don't see it with GNOME.

umm, could you try to find something that always does it, so i can try
to reproduce? cause i dont really hit any such thing, and i only have a
2ghz amd64

>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/