Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Apr 05 2007 - 08:13:23 EST



* Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
> >
> > - thud.c: this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
> > - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously!
>
> Hmm. Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless. If you have a second, can
> you send me a top snapshot? If you're running many of them, it can
> take a bit for the throttle to catch them all.

ah, indeed - i ran 10 of them and letting them run for a bit smoothes
things out.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/