Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 7/7] containers (V7): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:13:37AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > ns should have a refcount of 1 to begin with.
> 
> Right - that's my point, you're effectively passing the initial
> refcount of the nsproxy to the container directory's d_fsdata
> reference.

sure ..

> > Basically I am struggling to answer "How can a zero refcount (beancounter)
> > object go non-zero when zero tasks are attached to it" ..
> 
> In that case, I think you're fine. Your last posted patches didn't
> provide a way to check for that, though, as far as I could see.

Yes, the last patch I posted is very primitive considering all the
discussions we had ..For ex: attach_task() in the last patch has more
bugs [apart from the exit race I found recently with cpusets/containers]
Each time I stopped and stared at attach_task() I could find a bug ..

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/