Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 04/06, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Thinking about it I do agree with Linus that two lists sounds like the
> right solution because it ensures we always have O(1) time when
> waiting for a zombie.

Well. I bet this will be painful, and will uglify the code even more.

do_wait() has to iterate over 2 lists, __ptrace_unlink() should check
->exit_state, etc...

>                        I'd like to place the list head for the zombie
> list in the signal_struct and not in the task_struct so our
> performance continues to be O(1) when we have a threaded process.

Sure. It would be nice to move ->children into signal_struct at first.
Except this change breaks (in fact fixes) ->pdeath_signal behaviour.

> The big benefit of the zombie list over your proposed list reordering
> is that waitpid can return immediately when we don't have zombies to
> wait for, but we have lots of children.

TASK_TRACED/TASK_STOPPED ?

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/