Re: If not readdir() then what?

[Trond Myklebust]

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 07:37 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday April 10, trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 07:12 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > > 
> > > Is there something that makes that interface problematic?
> > 
> > File deletions...
> 
> How are they a problem ?
> 
> There are only two ways to organise a directory.
> 1/ Unsorted linear list of entries in which no repacking is ever done.
> 2/ Some data structure using an ordered search key that is based on
>   the filename (e.g. a B-tree with a search key that is a hash of the
>   filename). 
> 
> In the first case, you just use a fixed opaque cookie for location in
> a directory.
> In the second you use the filename.  If the file has been deleted,
> that shouldn't stop you finding the place where it would have been in
> the overall sort order.

I beg to differ. RAMFS is an instance of a filesystem which uses an
unsorted linear list of entries which is automatically repacked when you
delete a file.

You may also have filesystems which are only partially sorted. The
dcache is for instance organised as a hashtable with multiple entries
per bucket...

Cheers
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/