Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?

[Jesper Juhl]

On 15/04/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   in a recent posting, ian anderson suggested that, before kernel
> features are removed, they should spend a reasonable amount of time in
> the feature removal file to give everyone fair warning.  if that's the
> case, then there are a *bunch* of things that should perhaps be added
> to that file real soon now just to start the clock ticking.
[snip]
> ./sound/oss/Kconfig:    bool "Obsolete OSS drivers"
> ./sound/oss/Kconfig:      This option enables support for obsolete OSS drivers that
>
>   clearly, that was a fairly brainless search, but it still reveals a
> pile of stuff that's "obsolete" (whatever that means in the context in
> which it's used).  so what's really obsolete?
IIRC Adrian Bunk is handling the removal of obsolete OSS drivers and
doing a nice job at it. Dunno about the rest of the stuff.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/