Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Williams <pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of 
> rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock?  This would take the nice 
> value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when 
> determining what's fair.
> 
> Peter

> PS You'd have to change the migration thread's load_weight from 0 to 1 
> in order to prevent divide by zero without having to explicitly check 
> for it every time.

yeah - nice idea, i'll try this.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/