Re: [PATCH] nfs4state reclaimer: Remove unnecessary allow_signal

[Trond Myklebust]

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 01:59 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4state.c |    2 --
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> index 5fffbdf..d16393f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> @@ -775,8 +775,6 @@ static int reclaimer(void *ptr)
>  	struct rpc_cred *cred;
>  	int status = 0;
>  
> -	allow_signal(SIGKILL);
> -
>  	/* Ensure exclusive access to NFSv4 state */
>  	lock_kernel();
>  	down_write(&clp->cl_sem);

Ditto...



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/