Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Thu Apr 19 2007 - 13:35:27 EST


On Thursday 19 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> You can certainly script it with -geometry. But it is the wrong
>> application for this matter, because you benchmark X more than
>> glxgears itself. What would be better is something like a line
>> rotating 360 degrees and doing some short stuff between each degree,
>> so that X is not much sollicitated, but the CPU would be spent more on
>> the processes themselves.
>
>at least on my setup glxgears goes via DRI/DRM so there's no X
>scheduling inbetween at all, and the visual appearance of glxgears is a
>direct function of its scheduling.
>
> Ingo

That doesn't appear to be the case here Ingo. Even when I know the rest of the
system is lagged, glxgears continues to show very smooth and steady movement.

--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Yow! I just went below the poverty line!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/