Re: SLUB: kmem_cache_destroy doesn't - version 2.

[Christoph Lameter]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:

> Another option might be to name each cache actually created with a
> unique name, and then create a symlink for each cache that was asked
> for (whether it was created or whether a pre-existing cache was used).
> Then being lazy about deletion shouldn't be a problem.

You may be right.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/