Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
From: Chris Friesen
Date: Tue Apr 24 2007 - 11:17:26 EST
Rogan Dawes wrote:
My concern was that since Ingo said that this is a closed economy, with
a fixed sum/total, if we lose a nanosecond here and there, eventually
we'll lose them all.
I assume Ingo has set it up so that the system doesn't "lose" partial
nanoseconds, but rather they'd just be accounted to the wrong task.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/