Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Tue Apr 24 2007 - 16:00:47 EST
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well, it _is_ mysterious.
> Did you try to locate the code which failed? I got lost in macros and
> include files, and gave up very very easily. Stop hiding, Ingo.
OK, I've managed to reproduce it. Removing the local_irq_save/restore
from sched_clock() makes it go away, as I'd expect (otherwise it would
really be magic). But given that it never seems to touch the softlockup
during testing, I have no idea what difference it makes...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/