Re: [patch 1/4] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog
From: Daniel Walker
Date: Tue Apr 24 2007 - 16:54:11 EST
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 13:24 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> And sched_clock's use of local_irq_save/restore appears to be absolutely
> correct, so I think it must be triggering a bug in either the self-tests
> or lockdep itself.
Why does sched_clock need to disable interrupts?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/