Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:hang in atomic copy)
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Apr 25 2007 - 15:43:50 EST
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:25:12 +0200 Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > And even 3W would still be a waste of energy.
> > .. but if the alternative is a feature that just isn't worth it, and
> > likely to not only have its own bugs, but cause bugs elsewhere? (And yes,
> > I believe STD is both of those. There's a reason it's called "STD". Go
> > to google and type "STD" and press "I'm feeling lucky". Google is God).
> Is there really no use case for STD?
I use it all the time. The batteries only seem to last a day or so in STR.
Plus one is supposed to power off all electrical equipment during takeoff
> No worries if power is completely lost.
To change batteries.
> Some people might boot Windows between suspending and resuming.
I use that often too. (But I won't when I get around to upgrading the X
driver to get the VaioOfDeath's external video output working under
I don't think I need a fancy splash screen tho.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/