Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44
From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Wed Apr 25 2007 - 16:16:55 EST
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:58:40AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Adjustments to the lag computation for for arrivals and departures
> during execution are among the missing pieces. Some algorithmic devices
> are also needed to account for the varying growth rates of lags of tasks
> waiting to run, which arise from differing priorities/weights.
that was the principle of my proposal of sorting tasks by expected completion
time and using +/- credit to compensate for too large/too short slice used.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/