Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2:hang in atomic copy)

From: Kenneth Crudup
Date: Wed Apr 25 2007 - 18:19:55 EST



On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> For me it was a serious regression if STD was removed without any
> replacement.

Amen. I have even made material donations to the SS2 effort to give the
developer what he'd needed to fix an issue with a certain configuration
and will do so again if need be, as that expense would be minor compared
to the productivity (== billing) loss that arises from having to start
over from scratch from each of the 3+ times per day I have to shutdown
and physically relocate my machine from place-to-place or client-to-client.

-Kenny

--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles
O: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/