Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Wed Apr 25 2007 - 19:46:50 EST
> > Current design is:
> Broken. Yes. I've tried to tell you.
> It's worse than just confusing, it's *idiotic*.
> It _can_ work in practice, but
> - we have pretty damn solid evidence that it doesn't work all that often
> in practice
> - the fact that something *can* be done the stupid way is in no way an
> argument that it *should* be done the stupid way.
> I claim that the current STD is *stupid*. Yes, it can work. But that
> doesn't make it less stupid.
Good. So you understand how it works.
> What's your argument? Your argument seems to be that it's not stupid,
> because it can work. Can't you see that that simply isn't an
> argument at
I tried keeping module_init/thaw/resume similar code, so that driver
authors can debug suspend-to-disk, cross their fingers, and have
suspend-to-ram work, too.
Now, perhaps enough people do std/str these days so this is not
important any longer... lets hope so.
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/