Re: Linux 2.6.21

From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Thu Apr 26 2007 - 04:36:10 EST

On Apr 25 2007 20:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>If the goal for 2.6.20 was to be a stable release (and it was), the goal
>for 2.6.21 is to have just survived the big timer-related changes and
>some of the other surprises [...] So it's been over two and a half
>months, and while it's certainly not the longest release cycle ever, it
>still dragged out a bit longer than I'd have hoped for and it should

I really appreciate the lot of -rcs, especially if there are so many
intrusive changes/regressions. Like Andrew, I have a feeling that it
gets buggier, but at least, it seems to be made up every ... two
releases. 2.6.16 was a good one, .18, and .20. I suppose the
bug/regression distribution between [2.6.16-2.6.17, 2.6.17-2.6.18] was
biased like [70, 50]. About 2.6.21 - will see, rc has been to my liking.
Since a picture says more than a thousand words, have
(The last kernel to have only 5 -rcs was 2.6.14 - interesting)

Happy hacking,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at