Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thu Apr 26 2007 - 08:41:32 EST


> > > The interface isn't even 64/32-bit compatible...
> >
> > It's not . And it's one of the worst interface I've seen lately. Did
> > anyone actually review this crap before it went in? I completely
> > agree with Linus that these kind of boundaries that lead to horribly
> > complex ioctl interface are totally wrong.
> it's a bit hard to see the point of it anyway: the resume binary (much
> of the focus of the ioctls) fundamentally lives as an 'initrd binary' -
> and most of the stuff that wants to execute in an initrd is
> fundamentally tied to the kernel anyway.

Typically... yes, it needs to be in initrd.

And yes, klibc would help here.

(cesky, pictures)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at