Re: [patch] unprivileged mounts update
From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thu Apr 26 2007 - 16:31:32 EST
> On Apr 25 2007 11:21, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Why did we want to use fsuid, exactly?
> >- Because ruid is completely the wrong thing we want mounts owned
> > by whomever's permissions we are using to perform the mount.
> Think nfs. I access some nfs file as an unprivileged user. knfsd, by
> nature, would run as euid=0, uid=0, but it needs fsuid=jengelh for
> most permission logic to work as expected.
I don't think knfsd will ever want to call mount(2).
But yeah, I've been convinced, that using fsuid is the right thing to
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/