Re: [PATCH 0/5] fallocate system call
From: JÃrn Engel
Date: Fri Apr 27 2007 - 10:47:59 EST
On Fri, 27 April 2007 14:10:03 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> After long discussions where at least two possible implementations
> were suggested that would work on _all_ architectures you chose one
> which doesn't and causes extra effort.
I believe the long discussion also showed that every possible
implementation has drawbacks. To me this one appeared to be the best of
many bad choices.
Is this implementation worse than we thought?
The grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to
love, and something to hope for.
-- Allan K. Chalmers
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/