Re: [PATCH 0/5] fallocate system call
From: Chris Wedgwood
Date: Fri Apr 27 2007 - 16:51:09 EST
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:46:13PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> If one insists to have fd at first argument, what is wrong with
> having u32 arguments only?
Well, I was one of those who objected as it seems *UGLY* to me.
> It's not that this syscall comes even close to what can be
> considered performance critical...
> It adds userspace overhead for one architecture. Every *trace and
> *libc needs special handling on s390 for this syscall. I would
> prefer to avoid this.
I'm not that bothered about it. I would prefer it did use clean
64-bit arguments, but given it's a non-critical syscall I'm don't
think the aesthetics are worth impossing crud on s390 for.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/