If Adrian cares to note which two regressions he had in mind in his previous post <20070426125802.GL3468@xxxxxxxxx> or what the exact timing was I'll let him continue this.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bill Davidsen wrote:If the result is fixing things which then don't get fixed in mainline, as
That whole premise is flawed. The *rule* for the stable tree is that things don't get merged into the stable tree unless they are fixed in mainline already.
We had that problem in the 2.4.x / 2.5.x split. I think we learnt our lesson.I'd love to think that's the case.