Re: USB HID bug (was [PROBLEM] Bonding driver in linux-2.6.21-rc6-mm1)
From: Paul Walmsley
Date: Fri Apr 27 2007 - 19:24:41 EST
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Paul, do you have any idea? In fact, what was your reason for putting this
The static quirk list uses idVendor == 0 to mark the end of
hid_blacklist, so we don't expect any device to have idVendor == 0. If
a device is correctly presenting with idVendor == 0, we need a different
way to terminate that blacklist. Either that or there's an upper-layer
bug, as you write.
Regarding its placement: that WARN_ON() belongs in the static quirk lookup
code, rather than where it is now. Its current location must be a relic
of an earlier patchset.
Did you ever meet any condition when idVendor == 0 appears there?
No. There shouldn't be any functional problem with removing that
WARN_ON(), and also removing the initial if() in usbhid_lookup_dquirk().
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/