Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sun Apr 29 2007 - 03:31:23 EST
* Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > know of any other reports then please let me know!)
> There was Caglar Onur too but he said he will redo all the tests.
well, Caglar said CFSv7 works as well as CFSv6 in his latest tests and
that he'll redo all the tests to re-verify his original regression
> In fact, what I'd like to see in 2.6.22 is something better for
> everybody and with *no* regression, even if it's not perfect.
> I had the feeling that SD matched that goal right now, [...]
curious, which are the reports where in your opinion CFS behaves worse
than vanilla? There were two audio skipping reports against CFS, the
most serious one got resolved and i hope the other one has been resolved
by the same fix as well. (i'm still waiting for feedback on that one)
> [...] except for Mike who has not tested recent versions. [...]
actually, dont discount Mark Lord's test results either. And it might be
a good idea for Mike to re-test SD 0.46?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/