Re: Back to the future.
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Apr 29 2007 - 05:01:00 EST
> > Ie we do have history of _not_ freezing things. The freezing came later,
> > and came with the subsystem that had more problems..
> It doesn't have that many problems as you are trying to suggest. At present,
> the only problems with it happen if someone tries to "improve" it in the way
> I did with the workqueues.
> Anyway, the freezing of tasks, including kernel threads, is one of the few
> things on which Pavel, Nigel and me completely agree that they should be done,
> so perhaps you could accept that?
Actually, if we want to support OLPC _nicely_, we'll need to get rid
of freezer from suspend-to-RAM. Of course, that _will_ put more
pressure at the drivers -- and break few of them...
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/