Re: Linux 2.6.21
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sun Apr 29 2007 - 17:21:35 EST
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 11:16:51PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 29/04/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:56:57PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
>> > El Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:17:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Bugzilla might not be perfect, but it works and it's better than doing
>> > > it by hand.
>> > The good thing about the wiki is that it doesn't exclude bugzilla. It's
>> > just a "regressions list", it doesn't intends to replace bugzilla. If a
>> > doesn't gets fixed for a while, I don't think it's very useful to keep
>> > forever in the list like you do in the bugzilla, because I don't think
>> > it's possible to fix every single bug, and it steals you time to fix
>> > that you are able to fix.
>> > It's not great but it's the best clone of you we've found 8)
>> What exactly is the purpose of the 2.6.21 regressions list in the Wiki?
> It's for -stable team.
Did Greg or Chris say they have spare time for going through this list?
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/