Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol forrelocatable bzImage
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 12:06:11 EST
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Peter do we want to use the bootloader byte and assign lguest it's own
> bootloader type or do we want to add another field specific to
> paravirtualized environments?
The bootloader byte is already a bit too overused; I'm a little scared
that we're going to run out of boot loader IDs as it is.
We probably should add another field, and while we're at it maybe we
should add a boot loader extension field.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/