Re: to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Mon Apr 30 2007 - 20:24:30 EST
Andrew Morton wrote:
Yeah, a new-id patch is a pretty critical bugfix if you happen to have that
hardware. I'll get all these into 2.6.22 by whatever means and will adopt
your advice in future.
Probably these should go into -stable too, but I don't know what
Greg&Chris's position is on new device IDs.
I don't know either. But a one-line ID patch is pretty painless
considering the gain, so I would vote for stable@xxxxxxxxxx taking such
If it's more than one line added per ID though, NAK for -stable, IMO...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/