Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal?

[Andre Tomt]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   at the risk of spawning yet another thread and another flamefest,
> what *are* the kernel features that should be considered candidates
> for removal, either now or at some point in the future.
>
>   please, no discussions about mechanisms or kernel warnings or the
> like -- just the features whose value is nearing their end.  i'll even
> volunteer to collect all that info and summarize it here:
>
> http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Stuff_to_be_removed
>
> because that's just the kind of guy i am, and i have the week off, and
> i'm bored. :-)
>
> rday
>   
Already documented in the kernel tarball, see 
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/