Re: [PATCH] fix dynticks for voyager

[Matt Mackall]

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:51AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> As usual voyager tripped over an explicit boot CPU is zero assumption in
> the dynticks code.  This is the fix I have queued in the voyager tree.

Can we flush out all these assumptions by adding a constant offset
somewhere? Or reversing the ordering?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/