Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)

[Chuck Ebbert]

Chris Wright wrote:
> * Greg KH (greg@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> And is this really a problem?  The whole goal of the -stable tree was to
>> accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted
>> bugfixes and security updates.  It was not for new features or new
>> hardware support.
>>
>> If people feel we should revisit this goal, then that's fine, and I have
>> no objection to that.  But until then, I think the rules that we have
>> had in place for over the past 2 years should still remain in affect.
> 
> I have to agree.  I went back through my mbox and found vanishingly few
> pci_id update patches.   So it's not clear there's even a big issue.
> 

Of course you didn't find many -- most people know that's not part of
the -stable charter. If you asked for them you'd get them...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/